Grimm's Journal

[Guest]

Actually I count 4 (Prodigy, Finesse, Traxxus, You) plus one undisclosed PM, which is 5 members.

Amusing.

But like I said, I'm done debating this, it is so fucking obvious I feel stupider for having engaged in this conversation. Be as logical and "interesting" as you'd like.

[Guest]

[QUOTE=grimm1111;37608]Actually I count 4 (Prodigy, Finesse, Traxxus, You) plus one undisclosed PM, which is 5 members.

Amusing.

But like I said, I'm done debating this, it is so fucking obvious I feel stupider for having engaged in this conversation. Be as logical and "interesting" as you'd like.[/QUOTE]

So you're telling me that women like men who are emotional...?

Ok, now I feel dumber for arguing this....

[Guest]

Now you're twisting this around. Not emotional like a girl. Not cry baby emotional, like "I'm going to write a song about the dolphins."

You can be emotional in a strong way, and you can be emotional in a weak way. Obviously you want to be passionate about things. Don't get out of control, but obviously show emotion.

Read a romance novel. Look at rock stars, movie stars. All the men that women fantasize about are passionate.

Oh, and since Gunslinger brought up PUA gurus, look no further than Mystery and one of his main attraction switches - the willingness to emote. AND he talks about putting a girl thru an emotional roller coaster (not just good ones). AND he lays out the fact that you can't reason your way in to a girl's pants.

But you shouldn't need that to understand that women are emotional creatures who respond to emotion and passion. That's why I'm so dumbfounded that this isn't registering with you guys.

[Guest]

[QUOTE=grimm1111;37610]Now you're twisting this around. Not emotional like a girl. Not cry baby emotional, like "I'm going to write a song about the dolphins."

You can be emotional in a strong way, and you can be emotional in a weak way. Obviously you want to be passionate about things. Don't get out of control, but obviously show emotion.

Read a romance novel. Look at rock stars, movie stars. All the men that women fantasize about are passionate.

Oh, and since Gunslinger brought up PUA gurus, look no further than Mystery and one of his main attraction switches - the willingness to emote. AND he talks about putting a girl thru an emotional roller coaster (not just good ones). AND he lays out the fact that you can't reason your way in to a girl's pants.

But you shouldn't need that to understand that women are emotional creatures who respond to emotion and passion. That's why I'm so dumbfounded that this isn't registering with you guys.[/QUOTE]

Oh my god. You are twisting two concepts into one.

Being passionate about something and being an emotional wussy is not even remotely the same thing. NO! Passion is loving to spend your free time on a hobby, say painting.

Being emotional is crying when a girl walks out on a day two, or saying that you love her after talking to her for two min. Not the same thing at all. It's like comparing apples and oranges.

Putting a girl through an emotional roller coaster with your words is not *acting* in an emotional way. Again, these are two totally different things. So yes, Mister E is correct.

Yes, woman are emotional and ruled by their emotions. We all know that, but they are not attracted to a man who IS emotional. Especially attractive women, you can't act like an emotional little girl and expect them to be attracted to you. Being needy is a good example of being emotional. We can agree that women don't like needy men, yes?

[Guest]

I think this may have digress quite a bit when you brought in emotions and passion. If I recall correctly (and no one go back and edit posts now, ya hear!), the originally argument is whether being tact (using a filter and "edit" what you say) or just saying whatever you feel is more "alpha."

Personally, I believe being tact is alpha. Why? Because a true man can control his emotions what he says. not because he fears what people think, but because He understands cause and effect (of what he says), that what he says may have negative consequences...

Now onto women and attraction. If we could take a survey and ask all women, I'd wager that women find men who are tact more attractive.

[Guest]

[QUOTE=Prodigy;37612]I think this may have digress quite a bit when you brought in emotions and passion. If I recall correctly (and no one go back and edit posts now, ya hear!), the originally argument is whether being tact (using a filter and "edit" what you say) or just saying whatever you feel is more "alpha."

Personally, I believe being tact is alpha. Why? Because a true man can control his emotions what he says. not because he fears what people think, but because He understands cause and effect (of what he says), that what he says may have negative consequences...

Now onto women and attraction. If we could take a survey and ask all women, I'd wager that women find men who are tact more attractive.[/QUOTE]
Holy shit, you are right. How did the subject change so much? And what's even more shocking is that we all went along with it.

ha, yes, you can edit your post and still be Alpha. And tact shows that you are socially savvy, anyone can piss people off, that art for of it is do be tactful in the way you handle things.

[Guest]

Peace...... Love...... Harmony......and cute naked sexy women.......

Do what works for you, drop the rest, and keep gaming.

[Guest]

x

(could've used a filter when I wrote this one up! Ha.)

[Guest]

[QUOTE]Hotter than anyone I've seen any of you naysayers date![/QUOTE]

Dude, ratings mean absolutely shit. I'll take a girl who's got my back, to some floozy who'll run and hide any day. To me "10" encompasses so much more than looks.

"Passionate" does not equal "emotional like a women".

You're bein' an arrogant, jackass right now and you need to be a little more introspective and look at how you define things.

[URL]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ymYjcQOIJvY[/URL]

[Guest]

X