21 Children With 11 Different Women! Let's Discuss.

[Guest]

"A man aged 29 has fathered 21 children with 11 different women
Desmond Hatchett's brood came to light after authorities in Tennessee took him to court for non-payment of child support.
He has apparently set a U.S. record but said: 'It just happened.' "

Mr. Hatchett had 4 women pregnant in one year............twice!!

First off let me say I think what he did was deplorable. It's hard enough to grow up in this world without a father.

That being said I think there are some very important issues to discuss here.

I want to talk about this situation as far as it relates to attraction and social dynamics. There isn't much information on Mr. Hatchett other than a few brief news articles so I'm going to make some assumptions about this situation.

Remember these are just assumptions; they could all be wrong though I HIGHLY doubt it. I want you to tell me if you agree or disagree.

1. Several of the women he's had children with would continue to have sex with him even today without any reservation. (Or maybe a little reservation but they'd still have sex with him.)

2. He acts completely through his masculine intent when he approaches women. I'd be willing to bet he's never read "The Game" or "Attraction Is Not a Choice." He doesn't "think" at all when he approaches women. He just acts.

3. Several of the women he was sleeping with were completely faithful to him while they were together. In fact I'll bet some or the women would even resort to violence against the other women he's had children with.

4. His status amongst his male friends has increased since this story broke.

5. Now that he's been on the news, he will be approached by random women actually seeking to have sex with him.

6. Of the $500 he showed up to his child support hearing with at least half of it was givin to him by one of the women he's had children with.

7. Mr. Hatchett gives off the "Lover" vibe and not the "Provider" vibe. LOL

8. Some of these women cheated on their boyfriends or husbands to be with him.

The reason why I bring this all up is because of the irony of this situation. In social dynamics we study the behaviors of the Alpha Male. The "Cave Man" in us all if you will. In today's society what Desmond Hatchett did is completely unacceptable. In a cave man society what Desmond Hatchett would make him a very successful caveman. He bread with as many women as he could then moved on. If you ever listen to Mystery talk about "Survive and Replicate" that is exactly what this guy did.

Again, I don't like what he did but I am very interested in it. I'd like to see a documentary on this guy.

Do you agree or disagree with my assumptions and why?

[Guest]

Player!!!! It is funny because to cover child support the court is going to take away HALF of his monthly income. He works a minimum wage job and the sum each woman will get in one month is just over a whopping $1.00!

I think Dr. Mike is right in his assumptions. I would also like to add that I think that these women are not very high value. It is possible that the first few of the women he fathered children with are above average on the value scale, but probably not more than 3 of them would be worth having kids with(to a man with standards).

I read something that said the women he was involved with all knew he had other children. Now I do not know about you guys but I think the 11th girl is close to, if not, the lowest of low value female you can get. 21 kids with 11 women. That is an average of 2 kids per woman, obviously 1 of them would have to have to be the mother of only 1 of his children, but at 2 kids per woman the 11th woman would hear him say "Yeah. I have 20 kids with 10 other women." Imagine the nerves of dropping this bombshell lol. I don't think you would see a playmate get involved with a man that drops this kind of load on her. Hell no. She would kick his ass to the curb almost as fast as I would kick a girl with armpit hair to the curb. AND THAT IS PRETTY DAMN FAST!

[Guest]

Haha, thanks man.

[Guest]

Pathetic. I am ok with this if the guy is filthy rich and just wants a bunch of kids. But this loser should just get the death penalty.

Anyways all these women are super low value trailer park loser ass in bread pieces of shit.

I want you to think about something though even though I am calling all these people involved a waste of life.

I don't know how successful everyone here is with women. I don't know how many girls you have slept with. But think back on all the women you have layed. I will use myself as an example. I have not been with a shit load but I have had my fair share. I have had many ONS's and FB's. Out of all the girls I have fucked it has been my decision if I wear a condom 90% of the time. I am not exaggerating this %. And I am even talking about the first time I am fucking these girls. I am even talking about my ONS's. It is freaking disgusting that these women don't give a shit if I wear a condom.

With that said it now becomes my responsibility to pull out. I mean I could have blasted a nut inside all these girls and had a billion kids. And some of these hookers I would actually consider relatively high value.

I will say with some of these girls I was just as stupid and fucked them without a condom. On occasion probably half the time after we were fucking for a while they would say something like where are you going to cum? Meaning don't fucking bust a nut inside of me.

[Guest]

Yeah, I've had maybe 3 chicks ask me to wear a condom. The rest of them just took whatever I gave them...

As for the original post, I understand the concept driving assumption number 5. But, I think in this case it's not a reality. I suppose you could say that fame of any kind can get you laid or can have women seek you out for sex. But, given the circumstances, I'm just unwillingly to accept that premise IN THIS CASE.

Outside of this case, I would pretty much always 100% agree.

I think the rest of the assumptions are pretty much universal when you discuss what low value individuals have a tendency to do. Understand that we're not just talking about social economic status higher either...low value people are found across the spectrum of wealth and status.