So I recently came across a sentiment elsewhere on the internet and I wanted to comment on it. It's the notion that all you have to do is BE CONFIDENT and everything will fall into place.
I agree (with caveats), this is 100% correct. Being confident is all you need. The caveat is this: enough confidence is [i]sufficient[/i] to get women, but it is not the only way or necessarily the best way. I can't tell you how many times I've heard "all you need is X and you can get girls." Where X is looks, confidence, the M3 model, money, cocky/funny, or "my product". I have ranted before on TMTOWTDI so I will just summarize: there are many ways to get there, and no one way is best for everyone. Confidence is an element that runs through many aspects of game, and is important, but getting to the point where you're overflowing with confidence is not the best way for everyone, and is exceedingly difficult for most people.
So I said it was technically 100% correct that with enough confidence you don't need anything else. I'll also add that this is [b]100% unhelpful[/b]. Just like when your mom said to "just be yourself honey." What if you decided to take the confidence route? What actions would you take? Banging a lot of women is one way, but that just leads to a chicken-and-egg problem. Do you fake confidence in the mean time? If so, does that undermine your goal, since people are responding to your fake self?
Tonight I was contemplating, perhaps more game should be organized around things NOT to do, and reasons why. With bad things, I'm speculating perhaps it's much easier to draw the causal link between action and possible negative consequence. If you don't call a woman the next day, she may feel (perhaps correctly) that she was just being used for sex, and this will often make her feel bad about herself, which she will blame on you. This may come back in the future in the form of drinks thrown on you by women you don't remember fucking. So don't do that.
Positive things have cause-effect relationships also, but the difference is, things to avoid are much more atomic, meaning they are less interdependent. Should you make out in a bar? Does it get you closer to taking a woman home with you? It [i]depends[/i]. It depends on more things than can be enumerated.
Human interactions are complicated. Male-female interactions are perhaps the most complicated. There are broad, simple foundations which are probably sufficient, but there are also fascinating interactions and subtlety which are very real and also useful. Like a large tree, I doubt any person could know every twig and leaf. But nobody has to. There are many possible subsets of theory and practice which can work.
