First off, I have a lot of things going on right now (well, actually one thing. But it takes up a fucking ton of my time!) and I don't visit this page much. But I do check it from time to time. I'm in a very VERY, VERY, rich target environment and have the opportunity to game almost constantly in a variety of settings!
I logged in tonight and saw Scoundrel's poll. Since I haven't been a regular latey, I did a search for all of Scoundrel's posts before making my decision in the poll (You should too!). I found that most of Scoundrel's posts were very informative. Thanks to his posts, I've used a few of his suggestions and have been successfull with them. In my search, I found that there were only a couple of individuals who had issues with his posts (If you don't know what or who I'm talking about, I suggest that you use the search feature so that you can make an informed decision before voting.). These individuals claimed that Scoundrel was flaming them. It is my opinion that these individuals do not really understand or know what flaming is. Scoundrel was disagreeing with (attacking) their ideas, not attacking the individuals personally. These individuals need to respond by providing evidence that supports their ideas rather than just stating "I"m being flammed" (Maybe they can't defend their ideas so they resort this tactic? Something to think about.). THERE IS A DIFFERENCE!!! Disagreeing with an idea is not flaming. It's not a personal attack. A PERSONAL ATTACK would be flaming. Get a grip people! Not only is Scoundrel listed as a mod, he is a good contributer as well. I have not seen evidence of any flamming taking place. Other internet forums that I am a member of do not grant "moderator" status to those who have a history of flaming. He needs to stay.

