by Guest » Mon Sep 08, 2008 6:46 pm
I finally took the time to read the whole thing and there are elements I agree with, but also there are parts I don't agree with.
I agree when it comes to establishing a connection and how much of your persona is a facade vs. the real you. If your interactions are based on your facade and not the real you, then you will not find love. If you want to build a connection, you need to be presenting the real you. This should not be a surprise to anyone.
A lot of the rest of what she says I take issue with in one way or another.
1. I disagree with her characterization of game as simply adjusting perceived value. Perceived value is weak, actual value is strong, building a connection is strong.
2. She greatly oversimplifies the male psyche in a way that I find somewhat insulting. It's true people can get addicted to gaming women (or any other manner of self-improvement), but I know a LOT more who retain normal priorities and simply integrate attractiveness as a positive element of their lives.
3. She seems to believe that love is the inherently the goal of game. "Pickup is the mastery of attraction, which is directly related to the skill of love. Thus, a person seeking to become a master pickup artist is seeking to master love." Um, no, especially when pickup is narrowly scoped as adjusting perceived value. I would even go so far as to say that attraction and love are NOT very closely related. And by the way, love is not a skill.
4. She essentially claims that game and pursuing love are incompatible. I would argue that being comfortable and socially aware in social and sexual situations is an important positive trait that women require. Some men (such as myself) have been under-socialized for whatever reason (I was/am a nerd) and socialization through game works as a remedy, which builds true value. Some might say this is a side-effect of game, but I would say the only difference between a side-effect and a main effect is a matter of perspective. Are you going for appearances and incedentally building actual value, or going for value and building appearances along the way?
I read some of the other stuff on her blog, and she has a pretty good grasp of relationships in general. I just think she misunderstands what game is about.