Replace the HB# scale.

[Guest]

Source: [link=http://putupyourdukes.wordpress.com/2008/07/14/the-area-code-rating-system-why-1-10-just-isnt-enough/]http://putupyourdukes.wordpress.com/2008/07/14/the-area-code-rating-system-why-1-10-just-isnt-enough/[/link]

I figured I would share a little piece of wisdom that I picked up at the bar this past weekend. I only wish that I could take the credit for such a revolutionary idea, one that I predict will turn the people rating system industry on its axis.

So we’ve all been there, guys and gals. You’re standing there at the bar, and all of the sudden a member of the opposite sex walks in that you have never met. Immediately you turn to your group of friends, and what do you do? Only the most completely superficial thing known to mankind: reduce that person’s aggregate self-worth to a number between 1-10.

Now we all know the inherent problems with the traditional 1-10 rating system. Sure it’s simple, but how do you come up with one number to describe the intricate differences between various people? Surely not all 7’s or 8’s or 9’s are created equal. While some people utilize the decimal system to help with this problem, it just isn’t enough. Now let me introduce you to the area code system.

Okay, here is how it works. Every human being on the planet can be adequately described using a three-digit number (i.e. area code). The first digit denotes the rating of how attractive the face is (0-9). The second digit describes whether you would sleep with that person or not (0=no, 1=yes). And finally, the third digit describes how attractive the person’s body is (0-9). It’s a discrete and yet simple way to judge others in public without actually meeting them. Lets put this brand new rating system into practice, ladies and gentlemen, using celebrities that we are all familiar with:
Sarah Jessica Parker

Sarah Jessica Parker

Area Code Rating: 518

Rationale: Let’s be real, the huge nose and that mole just aren’t helping out her face’s cause. But her body is admittedly nice, and I’m pretty sure I could talk other girls into riding the tricycle with me and SJP just because she was on Sex and the City.
Anna Nicole Smith

Anna Nicole Smith

Area Code Rating: 813

Rationale: First of all, it’s been long enough, I’m allowed to make fun of her. Secondly, in her playmate days, Anna Nicole Smith was hands down a 919. But anyone who watched the Anna Nicole Show knew she eventually ballooned to walrus proportions. I gave her a second digit “1″ for the fact that if she was still alive she would be a great hookup for painkillers.

Kate Hudson

Area Code Rating: 919

Rationale: She is the hottest girl on the planet. This is essentially the same person as goldenlocks except female, attractive, down-to-earth, and not heading to rehab anytime soon. Please note that a 919 is “Kate Hudson hot.” Please only reserve this rating for girls that truly deserve it. So yeah, that swamp donkey sitting in the corner of the bar that you think is “kinda sorta cute” at closing time after too many pints? NOT a 919.
Rosie O'Donnell

Rosie O'Donnell

Area Code Rating: 000

Rationale: Ummm, I think we all understand the area code rating system by now.

[Guest]

I'm on board with this.
Google Marzia Prince, know she lives in Frisco, but her area code is 919.

[Guest]

why didn't god make more women like Marzia Prince????

[Guest]

If he won't, plastic surgery will.

[Guest]

There are TWO completely different scales.

Both scales work like this: a 7 is better looking than 70% of the female population. A 9 is hotter than 90% of the population.

Now, DEFINING population...that's a challenge. You go out on 6th street in Austin on a Friday night, is a 9 hotter than 90% of the women on Sixth street that night OR is she hotter than 90% of the ENTIRE female population, grandma included?

Therein lies the conundrum with the entire rating system. Just about any girl in her 20's is gonna rate 9 when compared to the average women standing in line at the Driver's License place. Take that 9 down to 6th street in Austin on a Friday night and suddenly she's a 6.

Should ratings be applied to age? She's a 9.5 for a 40 yo women, but only a 6.5 when compared to women in their 20's???

It's all depends on how you define "population".

[Guest]

Ok ok... Ever rated a girl 9 or 10 and than later after seeing her naked... she is not a even close to an 8.
Thank God for clothes.

[Guest]

You had me until your last example which points out a certain flaw in the system...

now first of all... let me say that in relation to most men, I don't mind small breasts at all... in fact I generally favor them compared to really big... while a friend of mine wouldn't even consider an a cup and a b cup would be borderline unless the girl were very petite ;) so after saying that...

kate hudson has the chest of a boy. I don't see how you can give her a 9 for the body ;) But it points out that maybe the one flaw in that system is it rates body overall... i think for a lot of guys breasts are as important as the other areas... so a solid rating would have to include those separate from body. You could add them to the area code... for example for you kate could be a 919a ;)

i guess it's all relative... in any case the rating is always depending on the person doing the rating... one person's 9 can be another person's 6 or 7.

[Guest]

Yeah all that matters is what you rate a girl. The only person I have seen close to my rating is Lion. Pretty much everyone else I have ever talked to is way skewed from me.

It just all boils down to taste. For example I rate heavily on body where I have a friend who rates heavily on face. So you could imagine how much different of a rating we would give a girl. I have seen up to a 4 point difference in girls with this person. So yeah the HB Scale...to each their own!

[Guest]

[quote1216322034=Imager]Thank God for clothes.[/quote1216322034]

Totally disagree.

Women use clothes to hide their imperfections.

The other day, I bedded a chick that had some big knockers but when she took off her clothes those fucking things sagged to her belly button.

Everything about her was great save for the nasty, droopy tits.

How many times have you ever pulled chicks jeans off to see the dreaded cottage cheese lurking under them?

Once is too much.

Clothes suck, they are deceptive.

And, big tits suck too. They will sag. Maybe not right now but soon enough.

By the way, if you're complaining because your chick went from a 10 to an 8, or a 9 to an 8 then you've got some unrealistic expectations.

I can only think of two or three women that I've bedded, off the top of my head, that actually looked better naked than with clothes.

[Guest]

the solution to all of this is that all women must be nudists then... The question is will I still want to help little old granny cross the street when shes nude?

Other than the set physiological things we find attractive as men its all some gay dude in europe tellin us what's hot.

Using this system I can imagine 40 numbers flying in the air as an attractive girl walks in. My pickup line? Yatzee!!!!