There isn't enough time in a day to try to pick the good nuggets out of any steaming pile you lay on this forum. And yes, commenting on your incoherence is relevant because there's no way to make a point when it isn't clear. Or existent. But if your goal is to win us over with power of confusion, then you're well on your way.
I'm glad you addressed the number rating system in regards to looks, because I don't use one. I don't care about 7's with big butts, 9's with big tits, or 2's with big hearts. I go by the digital scale; either you want to fuck her or you don't. Because in the grand scheme of things, an orgasm with an '8' doesn't feel any different than with a '7'. Or a '2' for that matter. 30 seconds is all she's getting from you either way. As far as I'm concerned, a number system is just some unnecessary bullshit that will make you treat one girl differently over another. You put a bunch of value on her looks and all of a sudden she's unattainable. And you claim you use a number system because everyone else does? Bullshit, you refer to that crap more than anyone else here. Another reason it's pointless is because every guy has his preferences. The shit is way too subjective. I've heard guys say "she's a 10 to me." So in essence that means "a lot of other guys won't think she's a 10." Instead you could just have said "I'd bang her" and hear the rounds of applause of agreement from others.
The other reason for a number system is for bragging rights with your brahs. Which if all of you were actually getting laid regularly, you'd realize how little it actually mattered. And from the looks of things, the wing you're about to dump sounds exactly like you do to me when you post on here. Find a post where I talked about lowering standards or getting with only "# and above". Nonexistent. The guys who say they only get with a certain hotness of chick are going to find any reason she doesn't meet their ridiculous standard just to make themselves feel better about not being able to get her in the first place. Or shit their pants when they try to game her, because they put all this unnecessary value on her.
How trivial is something that's cut and dry? And how does "not going after only 10's" somehow translate to "talking to not as hot chicks who will talk to you all night"? Firstly, I don't waste that much time in set. If I can't get the ball rolling in some fashion within 10 minutes I'm out. 3 or 4 of my most recent pulls have happened after 1:30am. There's no time to talk to her all night when you're working cleanup crew.
And there's no such thing as "practicing" with 7's because like I said they don't exist. Every girl you talk to is the big show. Why? Because all the 'practicing' is with girls you would fuck. The ones you find repulsive, you don't talk to. Sounds pretty cut and dry to me. It's cool you have a girl come out of nowhere after 2 weeks wanting to hang out. Congrats...no really. My question is what are you doing during the 2 week period that she wasn't in existence? My guess is nothing, if you're not talking to less than a 10 or whatever bullshit standard you're going to abide by.
Your analogies are flawed. Once again you're putting all the value on looks. The real value is your compatibility or her level of attraction to you. Swinging at a 90mph fastball is like trying over and over with girls who aren't interested in you. The 'softball' is a girl who's actually interested, because more of what you say has a chance to hit when she's into you. And it has NOTHING to do with the bullshit looks scale you've rated them on. I've talked to legit looking chicks (see other thread) who were geeking over me after 5-10 minutes of regular conversation, and also much uglier chicks who were not feeling me at all after I put on a performance worthy of an Oscar.
Why is going after a woman who's playing hard to get such a necessity? For your own ego? You'd be surprised how quickly she'll put that card back in the deck when she realizes she has competition. Of course if you're sitting around for 2 weeks doing nothing till they hit you up and/or have 100 back and forths with them over text, they won't get that idea.
Still not understanding you about this texting and phone thing. Walking around trying to remember a girl's number if you average 5-10 approaches a night is stupid. Of course you don't do that many approaches because you only talk to 10's, right. That being said, you don't have to pull out your phone to take down her number when you give her yours and TELL HER TO CALL YOU.
So you'll have to explain to me how going after women who play hard to get is efficient. It took you 6 years of going out one night a week (which I'll address later) to get a SNL with a mom in a bad marriage? Yea, talk about hard to get. She definitely held all the trump cards in that situation.
You could spend 3 hours with the goal of getting numbers or 3 hours going for pulls. Funny enough, if you go for the pull and are unsuccessful, you're still left with the number. And the knowledge that she knows your intent, which greases the skids for the next time you see her. Of course if you want to be her gay friend for two weeks and text her 100 times a day, great. But you won't be able to do that when there's 5 other girls in the picture. But there's no way to prove you will or won't get with her (probably won't), so I won't touch that. It's kinda funny, when I think about it, that the girls I text the most are the ones I end up seeing the least. And it has nothing to do with my skill, but girls sure do love text buddies. Married ones, ones with boyfriends, single ones, doesn't matter.
Okay I can interpret your offer two ways, both of which are ridiculously insane:
1. You're going to come to town and teach me how to get 'unattainable' chicks over the course of two days for the low, low price of $1000. The RSD Hot Seat in Austin was $300. You'll have to remind me who you are again.
or
2. You're going to come to town and show me how I can spend $500 a night to get the kind of girls I never believed I could get. Which makes no sense, considering I've spent less than $200 total on women in my entire life. Winning.
Now let's do the math real quick. One night a week for 6 years. That's ~300 nights out. In Little Rock at that. I went out 29 times between May-June 2012. Which means I already knocked out 10% of your nights in a measly 2 months time. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and say you approach three stone cold 10's each night. In Little Rock, mind you. That's 900 approaches.
I usually average 2-3 nights a week, and in the past 6 years have spent 2 years each between Iowa, Dallas and LA (keeping it even). That's 600-900 nights out. Not approaches...nights out. Which means at one approach a night I'm already on par with you. BUT...I go 'slumming' for 7's or whatever you said I do, so on any given night I can easily talk to 5 or more girls (more 7's available of course). That puts me at 3000 on the low end. You can understand why I don't bother to text chicks 100 times a day. Or even 5 times a day for that matter. 4 times an hour is even more ridiculous.
So I just want to make sure I have this right. You want to charge me more than the pros charge when I have 3-4x as much in-field experience as you, clearly more knowledge, and all of that spread out over different parts of the country?
You keep saying you're going to come to Dallas. Nobody cares anymore. So stop talking about it.
Ninjamatt's reputation, we will remember you.
