Trax, I think you're giving these women a free pass man. I understand that having children, such as you do, certainly will change your perspective regarding women. But, you can't have it both ways. You can't live in a society that encourages women to be hyper-gamous, status jockeying, whores (for the most part) that don't need a man and then turn around and say that when she's finally in a relationship with a man she no longer is equal to the man and is now being led by him.
Rewind to the time before feminism where beta males had ample access to pussy by being a stand-up, model, productive member of society. Where he would trade his wages for a woman's love and a woman would trade her love for a safe and secure life. Back then, yes, men were more responsible for the woman because she was more dependent upon him. If he led her to believe that they were going to be married and together for the long haul BUT he didn't follow through then that is absolutely unethical, because she is so dependent upon him for her safety and security. No doubt it's unethical.
Fast forward to today. Women don't need a man. There is not the same level of dependence they have on a man. As such, the man doesn't have the responsibility to do anything with her other than try to 'groom' (bad word I know) her to be the kind of woman he wants her to be (alpha males can and routinely do do this with women that love them). Men have no great responsibility to provide women with anything. They don't need us remember? So, I'm not going to try to protect her from me in anyway. She can believe all day, everyday that she and me will be together forever. That shit's on her man. Not me. Women cannot have their cake and eat it too...I'm independent, I'm in love with an alpha male, he never promised a future but since he loves me and he's here then we'll be married, then he left and he's an asshole for leaving because he LET me stay, I'm an innocent victim here, the big, bad man hurt me.
You probably see women as something to be watched over and protected. I, for the most part, do not. I see them as overgrown children that want to always have their way and never take responsibility for their own actions. Go to Uptown any night of the week and you'll see exactly what I'm talking about. Entitlement. Get on the Internet and read the profiles of fat, ugly, aging, single mothers and you'll see that they have a list of what they want and disqualifiers...fuck that shit man, these women should be happy that they can get ANYTHING.
It is in a woman's DNA to shower a man with love and affection. To care for and support, emotionally, a man. That is what women truly want to do, that is in their biology. But, most women have turned their back on that because that requires work and effort and isn't sexy and fun and empowering. If they're going to turn their back on their biology like that, then I'm going to do the same and turn my back on their biologically programmed desire to follow an alpha male and the implied responsibility I have to not be careless with her heart and emotions and time.
Having said that, not all women are like that. The ones that aren't like that you have to treat accordingly. If you meet a girl that isn't infected too badly by the feminist bug, then you need to absolutely be careful with her heart. You have a moral responsibility to make sure that she doesn't get led on.
My ex was a single mom, twice divorced (she just wasn't happy so she left), rode the cock carousel, and dragged her little boy from one man to another just to leave again. She was infected. I knew this and I acted and treated her accordingly. The one I was with before her was a 24 year old virgin. She was a wonderful, kind, femnine, beautiful woman. I only dated her for a month because I wasn't ready to get married and settle down. The timing sucked and I let her walk. I would never have led her on. She needed to be protected and that's what I did.
Only treat a woman the way she deserves to be treated.
